Title: Ocean Fathoms: A Dive into the Depths of Wine Ecology

Introduction:

In an intriguing turn of events, the Santa Barbara County District Attorney’s Office, with the collaboration of the city of Santa Barbara and the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, recently disposed of 2,000 bottles of wine produced by Ocean Fathoms. These bottles, once submerged in the ocean depths to age, were deemed unfit for human consumption by the Food & Drug Administration. In this blog post, we will explore the story and rationale behind the disposal, shedding light on the legalities and environmental impact of this unconventional winemaking process.

Beneath the Surface:

Ocean Fathoms, conceptualized by Emanuele Azzaretto and Todd Hahn, embarked on a unique winemaking venture in 2017. Their approach involved immersing cages filled with wine bottles one mile off the coast of Santa Barbara. These submerged crates remained on the seafloor for over a year, allowing vibrant reef ecosystems to thrive among and upon them. Despite the compelling ethos of their endeavor, Azzaretto and Hahn failed to obtain the necessary permits from the California Coastal Commission or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, according to the District Attorney’s Office.

From Ocean Depths to Legal Depths:

The legal ramifications for Ocean Fathoms came to a head when Azzaretto and Hahn pleaded guilty to a series of misdemeanor charges, including unauthorized discharging of pollutants into waterways and selling alcohol without a license. Court documents revealed that the company also engaged in investor fraud by accepting funds without disclosing their illegal operations. Furthermore, Ocean Fathoms marketed itself as an environmentally conscious enterprise, claiming to contribute to local environmental charities. However, the District Attorney’s Office found no evidence to support this claim.

The Final Gulp:

As part of their plea agreement, Ocean Fathoms had their prized sunken wine destroyed. The disposal took place at Santa Barbara’s wastewater treatment plants, while the glass bottles were appropriately recycled. Intriguingly, Azzaretto and Hahn were allowed to retain one bottle for personal use, but strictly prohibited from selling it. This move conveys the severity of their transgressions in disregarding proper business regulations.

Current Status and Social Media Presence:

Despite their recent legal troubles, Ocean Fathoms continues to maintain a presence on social media platforms. They recently posted videos showcasing their wine bottles on Instagram, though they swiftly clarified that those specific bottles were no longer available. Interested parties have inquired about acquiring a bottle of their unique wine, to which Ocean Fathoms has directed them to email for placement on a waitlist. It is important to note, however, that the company is currently prohibited from conducting any business activities.

Conclusion:

The story of Ocean Fathoms is a cautionary tale of the consequences that can arise from operating a business without the proper permits and licenses. While their innovative approach to winemaking initially generated intrigue, the legal and environmental drawbacks ultimately overshadowed any potential benefits. The disposal of 2,000 bottles of sunken wine serves as a reminder that even the most unconventional ventures must adhere to established laws and regulations. As Ocean Fathoms reflects on this episode, it is imperative that they take the necessary steps to rectify their legal standing and address the concerns raised by the District Attorney’s Office.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Noozhawk or any of its affiliates.